Goal
Promote use of locally sourced materials to reduce impacts from transportation
emissions, reduce fuel costs, and support local economies.
Requirements
Make an itemized list of all materials, parts, components and products intended for
permanent installation on the project including weights, total costs, shipping costs, and
location of purchase and/or source of these materials. Using a spreadsheet or table is
recommended for documentation of this credit. Show that your project meets the
requirements of Option 1 or Option 2 below.
Option 1. Choose local materials and product suppliers.
Compute the total cost of all materials, parts, components and products used for
project construction including all shipping and transport costs based on the project bid
list. Compute the percentage of this total cost that has been paid to materials
suppliers, processors, distributors and producers within a 50 mile radius of the
geographic center of the project. Points are awarded according to the minimum
percentages shown in Table MR-5.1.
Option 2. Minimize travel distance for project construction materials.
Disaggregate each material, part, component or product into its “basic materials” by
weight and express as a percentage of the sum of these weights. Compute the
cumulative fronthaul distance traveled for each basic material from point of origin to
the final endpoint on the project. Note this distance includes all intermediary points,
such as assembly or distribution, between the original source and the final placement
on the project. Report the total distance in terms of total freight miles (road, air, rail or
barge) traveled for each basic material. Show that at least 95% of these basic materials
by weight have traveled less than the maximum haul distances shown in Table MR-5.1.
Documentation
MR-5 Regional Materials
Share
Comment on credit MR-5
Thanks for the question JesseVH (NPS - JVH). We are pretty sure a spreadsheet should suffice. The level of detail, so long as it provides the requested information, is up to the project team preparing the document. Conceivably, you could compute both options using the same document and submit all of it; we would award points based on the method that gives you the best score.
As you mention, such a spreadsheet may be helpful for internal accountability purposes and for comparisons with other projects (even outside of NPS). Most projects we have reviewed thus far have this information (location, company or other source that has a physical address) in the bid list, but not in a succinct or formalized document. Typically weights of the heavy materials are known as well (e.g. tons of aggregate, tons of HMA/PCC). However, depending on location and complexity of the project, one of the two options will likely be easier to track and document.
If there are ways that we can refine and streamline this credit based on your experience, please let us know.
MR-5
How necessary is documentation of location and hauling distance? Seems useful for comparative purposes, to determine the “greenest” possible approach to providing project materials.
The consideration of regional materials is extremely important and relevant for NPS road projects and should definitely be considered.
NPS-JVH
Greenroads Manual Version 1.0 Review
You must be logged in to the Greenroads website in order to post comments on the manual. If you already have an account, please log in using the green login box in the upper right portion of the screen. If you do not have an account but wish to comment, please sign up for one here.
Thanks,
The Greenroads Team